The effect of esketamine combined with propofol-induced general anesthesia on cerebral blood flow velocity: a randomized clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: Esketamine is increasingly used in clinical anesthesia. The effect of esketamine on the blood flow velocity of the middle cerebral artery has a clinical guiding effect. To investigate the effect of esketamine combined with propofol-induced general anesthesia for endotracheal intubation on the blood flow velocity of middle cerebral artery and hemodynamics during the induction period. METHODS: The randomized clinical trial included 80 patients aged 20-65 years who would undergo non-intracranial elective surgery under general anesthesia in our hospital from May 2022 to May 2023. The participants were divided into two groups based on anesthesia drugs: sufentanil 0.5µg/kg (group C) or 1.5mg/kg esketamine (group E). The primary outcome was variation value in average cerebral blood velocity. The secondary outcomes included cerebral blood flow velocities (CBFV), blood pressure (BP) and heart rate (HR) at four different time points: before induction of general anesthesia (T0), 1 min after the induction drug injected (T1), before endotracheal intubation (T2), and 1min after endotracheal intubation (T3). The occurrence of hypotension, hypertension, tearing and choking during induction was also documented. RESULTS: The variation of average CBFV from time T0 to T2(ΔVm1) and the variation from time T3 to T0 (ΔVm2) were not obviously different. The median consumption of intraoperative sufentanil in group C was obviously lower than that in group E. At T1, the mean HR of group E was significantly higher than that of group C. At T2 and T3, the BP and HR of group E were obviously higher than that of group C. At T2, the CBFV in the group E were obviously higher than those in the group C. The incidence of hypotension was significantly reduced in the group E compared with the group C. There were no differences in the other outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: The induction of esketamine combined with propofol does not increase the blood flow velocity of middle cerebral artery. Esketamine is advantageous in maintaining hemodynamic stability during induction. Furthermore, the administration of esketamine did not result in an increased incidence of adverse effects. TRIAL REGISTRATION: 15/06/2023 clinicaltrials.gov ChiCTR2300072518 https://www.chictr.org.cn/bin/project/edit?pid=176675 .

Comparisons of fentanyl and sufentanil on recovery time after inguinal hernia repair in children: a randomized clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: Inguinal hernia repair is a common pediatric procedure. We studied postoperative recovery times in children undergoing laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair with anesthesia induced by fentanyl versus sufentanil. METHODS: We performed a pilot randomized clinical trial between February and December 2022. Eligible children were assigned into two age groups, 2-6 and 6-12 years old groups. Then, children in each age group were randomly assigned into either the fentanyl (2 µg/kg) or sufentanil (0.2 µg/kg) group for anesthesia induction. Baseline characteristics were collected. The primary outcome was the postoperative recovery time, which was recorded as the time period from extubation to a Steward recovery score reaching 6. Secondary outcomes included surgical duration, anesthetic duration, intubation duration, and intraoperative hemorrhage. RESULTS: There were 300 children, with 75 children in each group. In the 2-6 years old group, children who received fentanyl had statistically significantly shorter postoperative recovery times than children who received sufentanil (0.9 ± 0.4 versus 1.5 ± 0.3 h, P < 0.001). However, in the 6-12 years old group, children who received fentanyl had statistically significantly longer postoperative recovery times than children who received sufentanil (1.2 ± 0.4 versus 0.8 ± 0.4 h, P < 0.001). Baseline characteristics and secondary outcomes were comparable between two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Anesthesia induction with fentanyl or sufentanil resulted in different postoperative recovery times after laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair in children in different age groups. More studies are required to determine the appropriate induction anesthetic in children of different ages. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study protocol was retrospectively registered online at the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (registration number ChiCTR2300072177, retrospectively registered on 06/06/2023).

Effect of ropivacaine combined with sufentanil epidural anesthesia in abdominal surgery.

To explore and analyze the effect of ropivacaine plus sufentanil for epidural anesthesia during abdominal surgery, a total of 120 patients who underwent abdominal surgery at our institution between May 2019 and November 2020 were recruited and randomly assigned at a 1:1 ratio to receive either ropivacaine alone for epidural anesthesia (control group) or ropivacaine plus sufentanil (observation group). The total anesthesia effect in the observation group was significantly higher than that in the control group (96.66% vs 78.33%) (P<0.05). The combined anesthesia resulted in significantly lower visual analogue scale (VAS) scores (1.51±0.84, 1.63±0.56, 1.69±0.63, 1.54±0.42) in patients at 4h, 8h, 16h and 24h postoperatively versus ropivacaine alone (2.35±0.88, 2.49±0. 69, 2.47±0.78, 2.39±0.58) (P<0.05). The Ramsay sedation score (RSS) scores (1.98±0.81, 2.44±0.62, 2.18±0.62, 2.51±0.37) of the observation group at 4h, 8h, 16h and 24h after operation were significantly lower than those of the control group (1.42±0.52, 1.73±0.71, 1.47±0.66, 1.68±0.62) (P<0.05). Patients receiving ropivacaine plus sufentanil were associated with a lower incidence of adverse reactions than those given ropivacaine only (5.00% vs 30.00%) (P<0.05). In abdominal surgery, ropivacaine plus sufentanil epidural anesthesia resulted in reduced postoperative pain, enhanced sedative effects and a lower risk of adverse reactions versus ropivacaine alone.

Optimization of a tri-drug treatment against lung cancer using orthogonal design in preclinical studies.

A growing body of evidence suggests that anesthetics impact the outcome of patients with cancer after surgical intervention. However, the optimal dose and underlying mechanisms of co-administered anesthetics in lung tumor therapy have been poorly studied. Here, we aimed to investigate the role of combined anesthetics propofol, sufentanil, and rocuronium in treating lung cancer using an orthogonal experimental design and to explore the optimal combination of anesthetics. First, we evaluated the effects of the three anesthetics on the proliferation and invasion of A-549 cells using Cell Counting Kit 8 and Transwell migration and invasion assays. Subsequently, we applied the orthogonal experimental design (OED) method to screen the appropriate concentrations of the combined anesthetics with the most effective antitumor activity. We found that all three agents inhibited the proliferation of A-549 cells in a dose- and time-dependent manner when applied individually or in combination, with the highest differences in the magnitude of inhibition occurring 24 h after combined drug exposure. The optimal combination of the three anesthetics that achieved the strongest reduction in cell viability was 1.4 µmol/L propofol, 2 nmol/L sufentanil, and 7.83 µmol/L rocuronium. This optimal 3-drug combination produced a more beneficial result at 24 h than either single drug. Our results provide a theoretical basis for improving the efficacy of lung tumor treatment and optimizing anesthetic strategies.

Sufentanil inhibits the metastasis and immune response of breast cancer via mediating the NF-κB pathway.

OBJECTIVE: Breast cancer (BC) causes cancer-related death in women. Sufentanil is used for cancer pain and postoperative analgesia. This study aimed to explore the role of sufentanil in BC. METHODS: BC cells were treated with sufentanil, and cell viability was evaluated using the cell counting kit-8 (CCK-8) assay. Biological behaviors were analyzed using EDU assay, flow cytometry, transwell assay, western blotting, and ELISA. The levels of NF-κB pathway-related factors were examined using western blotting. A xenograft tumor model was established to assess the effects of sufentanil on tumor growth in vivo. RESULTS: Sufentanil at the concentration of 20, 40, 80, and 160 nM suppressed cell viability (IC50 = 39.84 in MDA-MB-231 cells, and IC50 = 47.46 in BT549 cells). Sufentanil inhibited the proliferation, invasion, epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT), and inflammation, but induced apoptosis of BC cells. Mechanically, sufentanil suppressed the activation of the NF-κB pathway. Rescue experiments showed that RANKL (NF-κB receptor agonist) abrogated the effects induced by sufentanil. Moreover, sufentanil inhibited tumor growth, inflammatory response, but promoted apoptosis via the NF-κB pathway in vivo. CONCLUSIONS: Sufentanil decelerated the progression of BC by regulating the NF-κB pathway, suggesting sufentanil may be used in BC therapy.

Sufentanil treatment inhibited BC cell proliferation, invasion, epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT), immune response, but induced apoptosis.Sufentanil suppressed the activation of the NF-κB pathway.RANKL (NF-κB receptor agonist) abrogated the effects induced by sufentanil.Sufentanil inhibited tumor growth, proliferation, immune response and promoted apoptosis via the NF-κB pathway.

Sufentanil inhibits Pin1 to attenuate renal tubular epithelial cell ischemia-reperfusion injury by activating the PI3K/AKT/FOXO1 pathway.

BACKGROUND: Renal ischemia-reperfusion injury (RIRI) has become a great concern in clinical practice with high morbidity and mortality rates. Sufentanil has protective effects on IRI-induced organ injury. Herein, the effects of sufentanil on RIRI were investigated. METHODS: RIRI cell model was established by hypoxia/reperfusion (H/R) stimulation. The mRNA and protein expressions were assessed using qRT-PCR and western blot. TMCK-1 cell viability and apoptosis were assessed using MTT assay and flow cytometry, respectively. The mitochondrial membrane potential and ROS level were detected by JC-1 mitochondrial membrane potential fluorescent probe and DCFH-DA fluorescent probe, respectively. LDH, SOD, CAT, GSH and MDA levels were determined by the kits. The interaction between FOXO1 and Pin1 promoter was analyzed using dual luciferase reporter gene and ChIP assays. RESULTS: Our results revealed that sufentanil treatment attenuated H/R-induced cell apoptosis, mitochondrial membrane potential (MMP) dysfunction, oxidative stress, inflammation and activated PI3K/AKT/FOXO1 associated proteins, while these effects were reversed by PI3K inhibitor, suggesting that sufentanil attenuated RIRI via activating the PI3K/AKT/FOXO1 signaling pathway. We subsequently found that FOXO1 transcriptionally activated Pin1 in TCMK-1 cells. Pin1 inhibition ameliorated H/R-induced TCMK-1 cell apoptosis, oxidative stress and inflammation. In addition, as expected, the biological effects of sufentanil on H/R-treated TMCK-1 cells were abrogated by Pin1 overexpression. CONCLUSION: Sufentanil reduced Pin1 expression through activation of the PI3K/AKT/FOXO1 signaling to suppress cell apoptosis, oxidative stress and inflammation in renal tubular epithelial cells during RIRI development.

Sufentanil combined with parecoxib sodium inhibits proliferation and metastasis of HER2-positive breast cancer cells and regulates epithelial-mesenchymal transition.

BACKGROUND: Sufentanil combined with parecoxib sodium is a commonly used postoperative medication for cancer patients. However, the effects of this combination therapy on human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2)-positive breast cancer cells have still remained elusive. This study aimed to investigate the effects and potential mechanisms of sufentanil combined with parecoxib sodium on HER2-positive breast cancer cells. METHODS: The cell counting kit-8 (CCK-8), colony formation, flow cytometry, scratch, transwell invasion, and angiogenesis assays were used to assess the proliferation, cell cycling, migration, invasion, and angiogenesis of HER2-positive breast cancer BT474 cells. Western blot assay was employed for detecting the expression levels of proteins involved in the cell cycle, migration, invasion, angiogenesis, and epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT). The in vivo effects of tumor growth and metastasis were examined by establishing an orthotopic transplantation mouse model of HER2-positive breast cancer (MMTV-PyMT). RESULTS: Functional assays indicated that sufentanil combined with parecoxib sodium induced blockade of HER2-positive breast cancer BT474 cells in the G1 phase of the cell cycle and inhibited cell proliferation, migration, angiogenesis, and invasion in vitro. Western blot assay revealed that sufentanil combined with parecoxib sodium downregulated the expression levels of cyclin D1, matrix metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9), cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2), vascular endothelial growth factor A (VEGFA), and EMT-related proteins (N-cadherin, Vimentin, and Snail), while up-regulated the expression level of E-cadherin in BT474 cells. In addition, it was found that sufentanil combined with parecoxib sodium inhibited tumor growth and metastasis in the orthotopic transplantation mouse model of HER2-positive breast cancer. CONCLUSION: Sufentanil combined with parecoxib sodium inhibited HER2-positive breast cancer progression, including cell proliferation, cell cycle, migration, invasion, and angiogenesis, and regulated EMT.

Sufentanil promotes autophagy and improves ischemia-reperfusion-induced acute kidney injury via up-regulating microRNA-145. / 舒芬太尼通过上调microRNA-145促进自噬和改善缺血再灌注诱导的急性肾损伤.

OBJECTIVES: Sufentanil has a good protective effect on myocardial and liver injury caused by ischemia reperfusion (IR), but its protective effect on kidney is still unclear. This study aims to investigate whether sufentanil can prevent IR-induced acute kidney injury (AKI) and to determine whether its efficacy is related to miR-145-mediated autophagy. METHODS: A total of 40 rats were randomly divided into 5 groups (n=8 in each group): A sham group, an IR group, a sufentanil group, a sufentanil+miR-145 inhibitor control group (an anti-NC group) and a sufentanil+miR-145 inhibitor group (an anti-miR-145 group). Except for the sham group, the other groups established a rat AKI model induced by IR. The sufentanil group, the sufentanil+anti-NC group, and the sufentanil+anti-miR-145 were injected with sufentanil (1 µg/kg) through femoral vein 30 min before ischemia. The sufentanil+anti-NC group and the sufentanil+anti-miR-145 group were injected with miR-145 inhibitor control or anti-miR-145 (80 mg/kg) through the tail vein before sufentanil pretreatment. The structure and function of kidneys harvested from the rats were evaluated, and the protein levels of autophagy-related proteins, oxidative stress levels, and apoptosis levels were measured. RESULTS: Compared with the IR group, the renal structure and function were improved in the sufentanil group. The levels of blood urea nitrogen (BUN), creatinine (Cr), urinary kidney injury molecule 1 (KIM-1), neutrophil gelatinase related lipid transporter (NGAL), tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), interleukin (IL)-1ß, IL-6 and ROS were significantly decreased (all P<0.05). In addition, compared with the IR group, the levels of Beclin-1 and LC3 in renal tissues in the sufentanil group were significantly increased (both P<0.05), and the apoptosis in renal tissues was significantly reduced (P<0.05). Compared with the sufentanil+anti-NC group, the levels of BUN, Cr, KIM-1, NGAL, TNF-α, IL-1ß, IL-6 and ROS in the sufentanil+anti-miR-145 group were significantly increased (all P<0.05), the levels of Beclin-1 and LC3 in renal tissues were significantly decreased (both P<0.05), and the apoptosis in renal tissues was significantly increased (P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Sufentanil can prevent the AKI induced by IR, which is related to the up-regulation of miR-145-mediated autophagy.

Pupil Diameter Changes after Anesthesia with Different Doses of Sufentanil under Ultrasound Monitoring.

Objective: This study aims to observe the changes in pupil diameter (PD) after anesthesia with different doses of sufentanil with the ultrasound method and observe whether pupil contraction is correlated with hemodynamic changes and bispectral index (BIS) values. Methods: A total of 124 patients between the ages of 18-65 with ASA I-II undergoing general anesthesia for surgery were enrolled in the study. According to the sufentanil dose initially injected, they were randomly divided into groups P, S1, S2, and S3, with 31 cases in each group. Group P was injected with normal saline. Group S1 was injected with 0.2 µg/kg of sufentanil. Group S2 was injected with 0.4 µg/kg of sufentanil. Group S3 was injected with 0.6 µg/kg of sufentanil. Following propofol administration and eye closure, the pupil diameter (PD) of the patients in the four groups was observed and measured by ultrasound after the loss of consciousness (T1) and within 3 min after the sufentanil injection at an interval of 30 s (30 s (T2), 1 min (T3), 1 min 30 s (T4), 2 min (T5), 2 min 30 s (T6), and 3 min (T7)). PD, systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), heart rate (HR), and BIS values at T1-T7 were recorded. Results: The ultrasonic method was used to observe that different doses of sufentanil could make the patients' pupils contract. During anesthesia induction, the changes in PD have a positive correlation with SBP, DBP, HR, and BIS values. Conclusion: Ultrasound can become a new noninvasive method to monitor pupil changes during general anesthesia, and ultrasonic observation of pupil changes has great potential for individualized analgesia management in the perioperative period.

Sedative effects of an intramuscular or intranasal combination of sufentanil and midazolam in New Zealand White rabbits.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the sedative effects of a combination of sufentanil and midazolam administered intramuscularly (IM) or intranasally (IN) prior to induction of anesthesia with propofol in New Zealand White rabbits. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, crossover, experimental study. ANIMALS: A total of 11 adult New Zealand White rabbits. METHODS: Sufentanil (0.5 µg kg-1) and midazolam (2 mg kg-1) were administered to rabbits via IM or IN route. The righting reflex was assessed, and sedation was scored. Heart rate, respiratory rate (fR) and temperature were recorded prior to treatment administration and after loss of the righting reflex. RESULTS: Measured variables remained within normal physiologic ranges for all rabbits. The only statistically significant change was for fR, which was significantly lower after sedation for both routes. The time to loss of righting reflex was 14.8 ± 6.5 and 12.5 ± 7.4 minutes and sedation scores were 6 (4-8) and 7 (6-8) for IM and IN routes, respectively, with no difference between treatments. No adverse effects were observed during the experimental period. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Sufentanil combined with midazolam administered either IM or IN resulted in moderate to deep sedation in New Zealand White rabbits at the dose rates studied.

Sufentanil alleviates pre-eclampsia via silencing microRNA-24-3p to target 11ß-Hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 2.

Pre-eclampsia (PE) is a prevalent pregnancy disease characterized by insufficient trophoblast cell migration (HTR8/SVneo). Consequently, accelerating trophoblast cell proliferation might ameliorate PE. This study assessed the effects and molecular mechanisms of Sufentanil (SUF) on HTR8/SVneo cells proliferation. HTR8/SVneo cells and PE clinical samples were used. Peripheral blood was collected from PE patients' samples, and microRNA (miR)-24-3p and 11ß-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 2 (HSD11B2) was analyzed in the blood and cells. HTR8/SVneo cells were treated with varying SUF concentrations or transfected with miR-24-3p mimics/inhibitors, or HSD11B2 elevation vector. CCK-8, colony formation, transwell, and flow cytometry assays were then carried out. Association of miR-24 - 3p with HSD11B2 was investigated. PE animal model was constructed using Wistar rats to verify SUF's role on PE in vivo. According to the results, SUF boosted HTR8/SVneo cell proliferation, and inhibited miR-24-3p to accelerate HSD11B2. MiR-24-3p was increased in PE, while HSD11B2 was inhibited, and miR-24-3p targeted HSD11B2. HSD11B2 reversed miR-24-3p's repression on HTR/SVneo cell advancement. SUF restrained PE's progression in vivo and in vitro via mediating the miR-24-3p/HSD11B2 axis. In conclusion, SUF enhances HSD11B2 via repressing miR-24-3p, thereby suppressing PE's progression. The study provides an insight into the possibility of using SUF as a novel therapeutic target for PE, which acts via combining with miR-24-3p.

Safety and Efficacy of Sufentanil and Fentanyl Analgesia in Patients with Traumatic Brain Injury: A Retrospective Study.

BACKGROUND This study aimed to retrospectively assess and compare the safety and efficacy of sufentanil and fentanyl in the treatment of patients with traumatic brain injury. MATERIAL AND METHODS A total of 85 patients with traumatic brain injury from June 2016 to September 2018 were included in this study, and were enrolled into a sufentanil group and a fentanyl group according to different treatment methods. The patients in both groups were assessed with the Critical care Pain Observation Tool (CPOT) for analgesic score, and Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale (RASS) for sedation score. RESULTS The scores of CPOT and RASS in the 2 groups were significantly lower than before treatment (P<0.05), but there was no significant difference between the 2 groups (P>0.05). The heart rate (HR), rate of spontaneous respiration (RR), and mean arterial pressure (MAP) of the 2 groups were significantly lower than before treatment (P<0.05), and the RR of the sufentanil group was significantly lower than that of the fentanyl group at all time points after treatment (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS Sufentanil has a rapid onset of effect, and it is safe, stable, and effective for patients with traumatic brain injury in the intensive care unit (ICU). Compared with fentanyl, sufentanil can also effectively shorten mechanical ventilation time, time to obtain satisfactory sedation and analgesia, and the length of hospitalization in the ICU.

Sufentanil inhibits the proliferation and epithelial mesenchymal transition of lung cancer cells through Wnt/beta-catenin signaling pathway.

Lung cancer is the most common malignancy and leading cause of cancer-related death. Sufentanil is a commonly used opioid anesthetic in clinics. This study aimed to explore the effects of sufentanil on the malignant behavior of lung cancer cells. H460 and H1299 lung cancer cell lines were selected for in vitro experiments. The MTT assay was conducted to detect cell viability. Proliferation ability was determined by colony formation and EdU assays. Transwell assays were performed to measure migration and invasion abilities. Western blotting was used to detect the expression of related proteins. LiCl was used to activate the Wnt/ß-catenin signaling pathway. Sufentanil decreased the proliferation, migration, and invasion of H460 and H1299 cells. The protein expression levels of vimentin, N-cadherin, ß-catenin, c-Myc, and MMP2 were downregulated, while those of E-cadherin and ZO-1 were upregulated after sufentanil treatment. LiCl treatment reversed the effects of sufentanil on H460 and H1299 cells. Sufentanil inhibited the proliferation, migration, invasion, and epithelial-mesenchymal transition of lung cancer cells by regulating the Wnt/ß-catenin signaling pathway.

Protective Effect of Sufentanil on Myocardial Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury in Rats by Inhibiting Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress.

Objective: Sufentanil is the most common drug in clinical practice for the treatment of ischemic heart disease. This study is to investigate the protective mechanism of sufentanil on rat myocardial ischemia-reperfusion (I/R) injury. Methods: A rat I/R model was established by ligating the left anterior descending coronary artery. A total of 24 SD male rats were enrolled and divided randomly into the control group, I/R group, sufentanil group (SUF; 3 µg/kg), and diltiazem group (DLZ; 20 mg/kg; positive control). The rat hearts were subjected to 30 min of ischemia followed by 120 min of reperfusion. Subsequently, hemodynamics, pathological changes of myocardial tissue, serum biochemical parameters, oxidative stress factors, the level of serum inducible nitric oxide synthases (iNOS), interleukin-6 (IL-6), and other bioactive factors were analyzed in the rats. Result: Compared with the I/R group, sufentanil significantly improved cardiac action, myocardial fiber, and cardiomyocyte morphology and reduced inflammatory cell infiltration in rats in the SUF group. And the level of creatine kinase isoenzyme (CK-MB), troponin (cTn), lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), malondialdehyde (MDA), iNOS, and IL-6 was significantly declined in the serum of SUF group, while the activities of glutathione peroxidase (GSH-Px) and superoxide dismutase (SOD) were significantly activated in the myocardial tissues. In addition, sufentanil also significantly decreased the protein expression of GRP78, CHOP, Caspase 12, and ATF6 in the myocardial tissue of the SUF group. Conclusion: Sufentanil has a significant protective activity on myocardial I/R injury in rats, the mechanism of which may be associated with the inhibition of endoplasmic reticulum stress and oxidative stress.

Pain management of nalbuphine and sufentanil in patients admitted intensive care unit of different ages.

BACKGROUND: Pain relief for patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) can improve treatment outcomes and reduce the burden on doctors and nurses. This study aims to report the clinical analgesic and sedative effects of nalbuphine and sufentanil on ICU patients. METHODS: This study retrospectively analyzed the medical records of 87 critically ill patients who received nalbuphine or sufentanil infusion in the ICU, including demographic data, diagnosis, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II, Critical Care Pain Observation Tool (CPOT), Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale (RASS), systolic and diastolic blood pressure, heart rate and blood oxygen saturation (SpO2). The primary outcomes of this study were CPOT and RASS scores. The secondary outcomes were hemodynamic changes, including systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, heart rate, and SpO2. The adverse events recorded during pain management, such as hypoxemia, respiration depression and bradycardia, were also collected and analyzed. RESULTS: None of the patients in both groups experienced episode of hypoxemia, respiration depression and bradycardia. However, age-stratified analyses showed that nalbuphine has a better analgesic effect than sufentanil for patients aged ≤ 60 (P < 0.05). In contrast, sufentanil showed a better analgesic effect than nalbuphine for patients aged > 60 ( P < 0.05). Furthermore, nalbuphine has a significantly better sedative effect than sufentanil for patients aged ≤ 60 (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: ICU patients of different age groups may be suitable for different analgesics. For patients under the age of 60, nalbuphine has better analgesia and sedation than sufentanil, and does not cause respiratory depression and drastic hemodynamic changes.

Sufentanil alleviates cerebral ischemia-reperfusion injury by inhibiting inflammation and protecting the blood-brain barrier in rats.

Stroke is a brain system disease with a high fatality rate and disability rate. About 80% of strokes are ischemic strokes. Cerebral ischemia-reperfusion injury (CIRI) caused by ischemic stroke seriously affects the prognosis of stroke patients. The purpose of this study is to investigate the effect of sufentanil (SUF) on CIRI model rats. We used middle cerebral artery occlusion (MCAO) to make the CIRI model in rats and monitored region cerebral blood flow (rCBF) to ensure that blood flow was blocked and recanalized. We used ELISA and RT-PCR to detect the expression of inflammatory factors in rat serum and brain tissue. In addition, we detected the expression of metalloproteinase (MMP) 2, MMP9 and collagen IV in brain tissues and performed Evans blue (EB) assay to determine the permeability of the blood-brain barrier (BBB). Finally, we clarified the apoptosis of brain tissue through the TUNEL staining and the detection of caspase3, Bcl2 and Bax. Various concentrations of SUF, especially 5, 10 and 25 µg/kg of SUF, all alleviated the infarct size, neurological function and brain edema of MCAO rats. SUF pretreatment also effectively reduced the expression of inflammatory cytokines in MCAO rats, including interleukin (IL)-1ß, IL-4, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10 and tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α. In addition, SUF also inhibited MMP2 and MMP9 and promoted the expression of collagen IV, indicating that SUF attenuated the destruction of the BBB. SUF also inhibited caspase3 and Bax rats and promoted Bcl2 in MCAO rats, thus inhibiting cell apoptosis. SUF pretreatment effectively improved the neurological function and cerebral infarction of MCAO rats, inhibited excessive inflammation in rats, protected the BBB, and inhibited cell apoptosis in brain tissue.

Clinical effects of low-dose esketamine for anaesthesia induction in the elderly: A randomized controlled trial.

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE: Esketamine is an N-methyl-D-aspartic acid (NMDA) receptor antagonist, which has stronger sedative and analgesic effects and fewer adverse events than ketamine. The effects of low-dose esketamine on haemodynamics and postoperative quality of recovery in elderly patients have not been evaluated. To evaluate whether low-dose esketamine can be safely used for anaesthesia induction in the elderly. METHODS: Eighty elderly patients were selected for unilateral total knee replacement under general anaesthesia from February 2021 to August 2021. Patients were randomly divided into two groups (n = 40): control group (C group) and esketamine group (K group). During induction of anaesthesia, the control group was intravenously injected with normal saline of equal volume, and the esketamine group was intravenously injected with 0.2-mg/kg esketamine. Both groups were induced by etomidate, sufentanil and rocuronium and maintained by combined intravenous and inhaled anaesthesia during operation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: HR, SBP, DBP, MAP and BIS values were recorded before induction of anaesthesia (T0 ), immediately before endotracheal intubation (T1 ), 1min(T2 ) and 5min(T3 ) after endotracheal intubation, surgical skin incision (T4 ), 1min(T5 ) and 5min(T6 ) after surgical skin incision. RESULTS: Compared with the C group, SBP, DBP, MAP, HR and BIS of the K group were significantly higher at T1 -T3 (p < 0.05). There were no significant differences in SBP, DBP, MAP, HR and BIS between the two groups at T4 -T6 (p > 0.05). Compared with T0 , SBP, MAP and BIS values of the two groups at T1 -T6 were decreased (p < 0.05). DBP of the K group at T2 was not significantly different from DBP at T0 (p < 0.05), but DBP of the C group decreased from T1 to T6 (p < 0.05). Compared with T0 , HR in both groups decreased at T1 , T3 , T4 , T5 and T6 (p < 0.05). Compared with the C group, the incidence of cough in the K group was significantly lower (p < 0.05); There was no significant difference in the number of myoclonus during induction between the two groups (p > 0.05). Compared with the C group, the number of hypotension episodes in the K group during induction was much smaller (p < 0.05). There were no significant differences in the incidence of hypertension, bradycardia and tachycardia (p > 0.05). There were no significant differences in postoperative recovery quality and incidence of adverse events between the two groups (p > 0.05). WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION: Low-dose esketamine for anaesthesia induction in the elderly undergoing knee arthroplasty may better maintain the stability of haemodynamics and has no adverse effect on the quality of early recovery after operation.

Gastroscopy sedation: clinical trial comparing propofol and sufentanil with or without remimazolam.

BACKGROUND: Propofol-sufentanil is often used in clinical anesthesia for patients undergoing sedative gastroscopy, but there are still adverse events such as longer recovery time, respiratory depression and higher doses of propofol etc. This study was to evaluate the sedative effect of remimazolam-propofol-sufentanil in sedative gastroscopy. METHODS: Patients who were going to have gastroscopy examination were randomly divided into two groups: group RM (remimazolam-propofol-sufentanil group) and group PR (propofol-sufentanil group). Patients of each group were anesthetized according to the corresponding anesthesia procedure, and all observation indices were recorded. RESULTS: In the RM group, there were only small and unsignificant changes in the values of SBP, HR, RR and SpO2 after anesthesia (P>0.05), while the values of SBP, HR, RR and SpO2 in the PR group at each time point after anesthesia were significantly lower than those at T0, and the values of SBP and RR at T2, T3 and T4 were also significantly lower than those at T1 (P<0.05). The dosage of propofol (38±9 mg) in the RM group was significantly less than that (115±15 mg) in the PR group, meanwhile the anesthesia time (8.4±1.6 min), awakening time (2.9±0.8 min), discharge time (6.7±3.1 min) of the RM group were also significantly shorter than those of the PR group (14.5±3.3, 8.7±1.9, 12.4±3.6 min) (P<0.05), but there was no statistical significance between the two groups in other indices (P>0.05). CONCLUSIONS: In clinical practice, remimazolam-propofol-sufentanil sedative scheme has more advantages than propofol-sufentanil sedative scheme.

[Ultrasound-guided stellate ganglion block improves sleep quality in elderly patients early after thoracoscopic surgery for lung cancer: a randomized controlled study].

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effects of ultrasound-guided stellate ganglion block (SGB) on sleep quality in elderly patients with lung cancer early after thoracoscopic surgery. METHODS: A total of 86 patients with lung cancer (ASA class I-III, aged 60-80 years) undergoing elective thoracoscopic surgery were randomized into stellate ganglion block (SGB) group (n=43) and control group (n=43) to receive ultrasound-guided right SGB with 7 mL of 0.5% ropivacaine at the C6-7 level and injection of 7 mL saline at the same site 30 min before anesthesia induction, respectively. On the day before surgery and the first two days after the surgery, sleep duration, sleep efficiency index (SEI) and N3 sleep stage of the patients were monitored using a BIS-Vista monitor, and Athens Insomnia Scale (AIS) scores were recorded. The plasma levels of norepinephrine and cortisol of the patients were measured before SGB (T1), at 5 min after extubation (T2) and at 6:00 on the first morning after the surgery (T4). Urine levels of 6-hydroxysulfate melatonin (6-HMS) were measured at 6:00 in the morning for 3 consecutive days starting on the day of surgery (T3, T4 and T5, respectively). VAS score, incidences of postoperative delirium and depression, sufentanil consumption after surgery, and discharge time of the patients were recorded. RESULTS: Thirty-six patients in SGB group and 35 in the control group were analyzed. In both groups, most of the patients had insomnia after surgery, but compared with those in the control group, the patients in SGB group had significantly longer sleep duration (P < 0.05) with a higher sleep efficiency index (P < 0.05) and a longer sleep time in N3 stage (P < 0.05) on the first two nights after surgery. The mean postoperative AIS score and incidence of insomnia were significantly lower in SGB group than in the control group (P < 0.05). Compared with the control group, SGB group showed significantly lower plasma levels of norepinephrine and cortisol at T2 and T4 (P < 0.05), a higher urine level of 6-HMS at T5 (P < 0.05), and a shorter discharge time after the surgery (P < 0.05). The VAS scores, postoperative incidences of delirium and depression, or postoperative sufentanil consumption did not differ significantly between the two groups. CONCLUSION: Ultrasound-guided SGB improves objective and subjective sleep quality in elderly patients early after thoracoscopic surgery for lung cancer to alleviate stress responses and sleep disorders, reduce postoperative hospital stay, and accelerate postoperative recovery of the patients.